References

  1. de Tocqueville A. Democracy in America. Paris, 1831.
  2. de Tocqueville A. Regards sur le Bas-Canada. Montréal: Typo, 2003 (1836).
  3. Turner FJ. The Significance of the Frontier in American History. Proceedings of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin 1893;41:79-112.
  4. Archer R. Why is there no labor party in the United States? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
  5. Heffer J, Rovet J, editors. Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? Paris, 1988.
  6. Bosch A. Why Is There No Labor Party In The United States? A Comparative New World Case Study: Australia And The U.S., 1783-1914. Radical History Review 1997;67:35-78.
  7. Sombart W. Why Is There No Socialism in America? New York, 1976 (1906).
  8. Lipset SM. Continental divide : the values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge, 1990.
  9. Lipset SM, Marks GW. It didn't happen here : why socialism failed in the United States. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2000.
  10. Archer R. Labour Politics in the New World: Werner Sombart and the United States. Journal of Industrial Relations 2007;49(4):459-82.
  11. Cox L. Review Essay: Revisiting the Labour Question in the United States. Thesis Eleven 2010;100(1):168-78.
  12. Forbes HD. Hartz-Horowitz at Twenty: Nationalism, Toryism and Socialism in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political Science 1987;20(02):287-315.
  13. Lipset SM. Agrarian socialism. Berkeley,: University of California Press, 1950.
  14. Blumin S. Mobility and Change in Ante-Bellum Philadelphia. In: Thernstrom S, Sennett R, editors. Nineteenth-Century Cities. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969:165-208.
  15. Knights PR. The plain people of Boston, 1830-1860: A study in city growth. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.
  16. Modell J. The Peopling of a Working-Class Ward: Reading, Pennsylvania, 1850. Journal of Social History 1971;5(1):71-95.
  17. Thernstrom S. The other Bostonians; poverty and progress in the American metropolis, 1880-1970. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973.
  18. Gitelman HM. Workingmen of Waltham: Mobility in American urban industrial development, 1850-1890. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.
  19. Katz MB. The people of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and class in a mid-nineteenth-century city. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.
  20. Gagan D. Geographical and social mobility in nineteenth-century Ontario: a microstudy*. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 1976;13(2):152-64.
  21. Katz MB, Doucet MJ, Stern MJ. Migration and the Social Order in Erie County, New York: 1855. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 1978;8(4):669-701.
  22. Glasco L. Migration and Adjustment in the Nineteenth-Century City: Occupation, Property, and Household Structure of Native-Born Whites, Buffalo, New York, 1855. In: Hareven T, Vinovkis MA, editors. Family and Population in Nineteenth Century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1978:154-78.
  23. Griffen C, Griffen S. Natives and newcomers : the ordering of opportunity in mid-nineteenth-century Poughkeepsie. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
  24. Darroch G. Migrants in the Nineteenth Century: Fugitives or Families in Motion? Journal of Family History 1981;6(3):257-77.
  25. Gagan D. Hopeful Travelers: Families, Land and Social Change in Mid-Victorian Peel County, Canada West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981.
  26. Dublin T. Rural-Urban Migrants in Industrial New England: The Case of Lynn, Massachusetts, in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. The Journal of American History 1986;73(3):623-44.
  27. Long J, Ferrie J. The path to convergence: intergenerational occupational mobility in Britain and the US in three eras. Economic Journal 2007;117(519):C61-C71.
  28. Heaton H. Other Wests than Ours. Journal of Economic History 1946;6(Supplement):50-62.
  29. Sage WN. Towards New Horizons in Canadian History. Pacific Historical Review 1939;8(1):47-57.
  30. Dubuc A. Problems in the Study of the Stratification of the Canadian Society from 1760 to 1840. Report of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Historical Association 1965;44(1):13-29.
  31. Stanley GFG. Western Canada and the Frontier thesis. Report of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Historical Association 1940;19(1):105-17.
  32. Helmes-Hayes RC. The Image of Inequality in S. D. Clark's Writings on Pioneer Canadian Society.
  33. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 1988;13(3):211-33.
  34. Francis RD. Turner versus Innis: Bridging the Gap. American Review of Canadian Studies 2003;33(4):473-85.
  35. Zaslow M. The Frontier hypothesis in recent historiography. Canadian Historical Review 1948;29(2):153-67.
  36. Sharp PF. When Our West Moved North. The American Historical Review 1950;55(2):286-300.
  37. Waldron FM. I've Never Dreamed It Was Necessary To Marry!" Women And Work In New England French Canadian Communities, 1870-1930. Journal of American Ethnic History 2005;24(2):34-64.
  38. Ramirez B, Otis Y. Crossing the 49th parallel : migration from Canada to the United States, 1900-1930. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001.
  39. Takai Y. Gendered Passages: French-Canadian Migration to Lowell, Massachusetts, 1900-1920. New York: Peter Lang, 2008.
  40. Mann R. Frontier Opportunity and the New Social History. Pacific Historical Review 1984;53(4):463-91.
  41. Wood JD. Places of last resort: the expansion of the farm frontier into the boreal forest in Canada, c.1910-1940. Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2006.
  42. Hudson JC. Migration to an American Frontier. Annals of the Association of American Geographers1976;66(2):242-65.
  43. Earle C, Cao C. Frontier Closure and the Involution of American Society, 1840-1890. Journal of the Early Republic 1993;13(2):163-79.
  44. Guest AM. Frontier and urban-industrial explanations of US occupational mobility in the late 1800s.Social Science Research 2005;34(1):140-64.
  45. Beard CA. The Frontier in American History. The New Republic, 1921:349–50.
  46. Shannon FA. A Post Mortem on the Labor-Safety-Valve Theory. Agricultural History 1945;19(1):31-37.
  47. Lee ES. The Turner Thesis Reexamined. American Quarterly 1961;13(1):77-83.
  48. Bogue AG. Frederick Jackson Turner Reconsidered. The History Teacher 1994;27(2):195-221.
  49. Schwantes CA. The Concept of the Wageworkers' Frontier: A Framework for Future Research. The Western Historical Quarterly 1987;18(1):39-55.
  50. Bouchard G. Family Structures and Geographic Mobility At Laterriére, 1851-1935. Journal of Family History 1977;2(4):350-69.
  51. Gaffield C. Boom and Bust: The Demography and Economy of the Lower Ottawa Valley in the Nineteenth Century. Historical Papers / Communications historiques 1982;17(1):172-95.
  52. Malin JC. The turnover of farm population in Kansas. Kansas Historical Quarterly 1935;4:339-72.
  53. Curti ME. The making of an American community; a case study of democracy in a frontier county.Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959.
  54. Throne M. A Population Study of an Iowa County in 1850. Iowa Journal of History 1959;57:305–30.
  55. Coleman PJ. Restless Grant County: Americans on the Move. Wisconsin Magazine of History1962;46:16-20.
  56. Thernstrom S. Poverty and progress; social mobility in a nineteenth century city. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.
  57. Thompson EP. The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage Books, 1963.
  58. Hobsbawn EJ. The Tramping Artisan. The Economic History Review 1951;3(3):299-320.
  59. Preston B. Occupations of Father and Son in Mid-Victorian England. Department of Geography, University of Reading Geographical Papers No. 56. Reading, 1977.
  60. Lambert P, Prandy K, Bottero W. By Slow Degrees: Two Centuries of Social Reproduction and Mobility in Britain. Sociological Research Online 2007. ;12(1).
  61. Kaelble H. Social mobility in the 19th and 20th centuries : Europe and America in comparative perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986.
  62. Mitch D. Literacy and Occupational Mobility in Rural versus Urban Victorian England: Evidence from the Linked Marriage Register and Census Records for Birmingham and Norfolk, 1851 and 1881. Historical Methods 2005;38(1):26-38.
  63. Hall PK, Ruggles S. 'Restless in the Midst of Their Prosperity': New Evidence on the Internal Migration of Americans, 1850–2000. Journal of American History 2004;91(3):829-46.
  64. Litwak E. Geographic Mobility and Extended Family Cohesion. American Sociological Review 1960;25(3):385-94.
  65. Astone NM, McLanahan SS. Family Structure, Residential Mobility, and School Dropout: A Research Note. Demography 1994;31(4):575-84.
  66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2001;50(1):1-17.
  67. Wolf DA, Longino CF. Our increasingly mobile society? The curious persistence of a false belief. The Gerontologist 2005;45(1):5-11.
  68. Faloon H. Tax Considerations: Moving Between Provinces. Canadian Moneysaver 2011(March/April).
  69. Piekarski C. Effect of an Increasingly Mobile Society on Kentucky's Grandparent Visitation Statute: The Ability of Courts to Enforce Their Orders, The. Brandeis Law Journal 2003;42(3):693-710.
  70. Fischer CS. Ever-More Rooted Americans. City & Community 2002;1(2):177-98.
  71. Layman GC, Carsey TM, Horowitz JM. Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 2006;9(1):83-110.
  72. Cooke TJ. It is not Just the Economy: Declining Migration and the Rise of Secular Rootedness. Population, Space and Place 2011;17(3):193-203.
  73. Ferrie J. History lessons: The end of American exceptionalism? Mobility in the United States since 1850. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 2005;19(3):199-215.
  74. Altham PME, Ferrie JE. Comparing Contingency Tables. Historical Methods 2007;40(1):3-16.
  75. Bourdieu J, Ferrie JP, Kesztenbaum L. Vive la différence? Intergenerational Mobility in France and the United States during the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2009;39(4):523-57.
  76. Long J, Ferrie J. Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Britain and the U.S. Since 1850. American Economic Review 2011 forthcoming.
  77. Long J. Rural-urban migration and socioeconomic mobility in Victorian Britain. Journal of Economic History 2005;65(01):1-35.
  78. Long J. The socioeconomic return to primary schooling in Victorian England. Journal of Economic History 2006;66(4):1026-53.
  79. Goeken R, Hall PK. New Findings on Internal Migration using Linked Records. Historical Methods 2011 forthcoming.
  80. Goeken R, Huynh L, Lynch TA, Vick R. New Methods of Census Record Linking. Historical Methods 2011;44(1):7 - 14.
  81. Miles A. Social mobility in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century England. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.
  82. Dillon L. The shady side of fifty : age and old age in late Victorian Canada and the United States. Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008.
  83. Dillon L, Gratton B, Moen J. Retirement at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: A Canadian Perspective. Canadian Historical Review 2010;91(1):27-59.
  84. Olson S, Thornton P. Peopling the North American City: Montréal, 1840-1900. Montréal: McGill- Queens University Press, 2011.
  85. Gilliland J, Olson S. Residential Segregation in the Industrializing City: A Closer Look Urban Geography 2010;31(1):29-58.
  86. Gauvreau D, Olson S. Mobilité sociale dans une ville industrielle nord-américaine: Montréal, 1880-1900. Annales de démographie historique 2008(1):89-114.
  87. Gauvreau D, Thornton P, Olson S. The harsh welcome of an industrial city: Immigrant women in Montreal, 1880-1900. Social History/Histoire Sociale 2007 40(80):345-80.
  88. Darroch G. Home and Away: Patterns of Residence, Schooling, and Work among Children and Never Married Young Adults, Canada, 1871 and 1901. Journal of Family History 2001;26(2):220.
  89. Van Leeuwen MHD, Maas I. Historical Studies of Social Mobility and Stratification. Annual Review of Sociology 2010;36:429-51.
  90. Ruggles S, Roberts E, Sarkar S, Sobek M. The North Atlantic Population Project: Progress and Prospects Historical Methods 2011;44(1):1-6.
  91. Minnesota Population Center. North Atlantic Population Project: Complete Count Microdata. Version 2.0. [machine readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center [distributor],2008.
  92. Roberts E, Ruggles S, Lisa Y. Dillon, Gar∂arsdóttir Ó, Oldervoll J, Thorvaldsen G, et al. The North Atlantic Population Project: An Overview. Historical Methods 2003;36(2):80-88.
  93. Ruggles S. Linking historical censuses: A new approach. History and Computing 2006;14(1/2):213- 24.
  94. Hacker JD. The Human Cost of War: White Population in the United States, 1850–1880 [PhD]. University of Minnesota, 1999.
  95. King ML, Magnuson DL. Perspectives on Historical U.S. Census Undercounts. Social Science History 1995;19(4):455-66.
  96. Goeken R, Nguyen C, Ruggles S, Sargent W. The 1880 U.S. Population Database. Historical Methods 2003;36(1):27-34.
    97. Dillon L, Ruggles S. Creating Historical Snapshots of North America in 1880 / 1: Collaboration Between Historians and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints On The 1880 / 1 Census Databases of the United States and Canada. Genealogical Journal 2001;29(3):107 - 13.
  97. Pamarthy K. A Machine Learning Framework for Record Linkage in Census Data [MS]. University of Minnesota, 2007.
  98. Vick R, Huynh L. The Effects of Standardizing Names for Record Linkage: Evidence from the United States and Norway. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 2011;44(1):15 - 24.
  99. Antonie L, Baskerville P, Inwood K, Ross A. Creating Longitudinal Data from Canadian Historical Censuses. Department of Economics, University of Guelph. Guelph, 2011.
  100. Antonie L, Baskerville P, Inwood K, Ross A. An Automated Record Linkage System – Linking 1871 Canadian census to 1881 Canadian Census. Department of Economics, University of Guelph. Guelph,2010.
  101. Gu L, Baxter R, Vickers D, Rainsford C. Record linkage: Current practice and future directions. CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences Technical Report 03/83. Canberra, 2003.
  102. Fellegi IP, Sunter AB. A Theory for Record Linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1969;64(328):1183-210.
  103. Jaro MA. Advances in Record-Linkage Methodology as Applied to Matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989;84(406):414-20.
  104. Belin TR, Rubin DB. A Method for Calibrating False-Match Rates in Record Linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995;90(430):694-707.
  105. Larsen MD, Rubin DB. Iterative Automated Record Linkage Using Mixture Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001;96(453):32-41.
  106. Winkler WE. Improved Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Section of Survey Research Methods. 1993,
  107. Christen P. Automatic Record Linkage Using Seeded Nearest Neighbour And Support Vector Machine Classification. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Las Vegas (NV), 2008.
  108. Porter EH, Winkler WE. Approximate String Comparison and its Effect on an Advanced Record Linkage System. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census Bureau Research Report RR97/02. Washington D.C.,1997.
  109. Winkler WE. String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Section of Survey Research Methods. 1990.
  110. Christen P, Churches T, Zhu JX. Probabilistic Name and Address Cleaning and Standardisation. Proceedings of the Australasian Data Mining Workshop. Canberra, 2002.
  111. Maletic JI, Marcus A. Data cleansing: Beyond integrity analysis. Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality. Boston, 2000.
  112. Nygaard L. Name Standardization in Record Linkage: an Improved Algorithmic Strategy. History and Computing 1992;4:63-74.
  113. Philips L. The Double-Metaphone Search Algorithm. C/C++ User's Journal 2000;18.
  114. Lait AJ, Randell B. An Assessment of Name Matching Algorithms. Department of Computing Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne. Department Technical Report Series 550. Newcastle, 1993.
  115. Christen P. Development and user experiences of an open source data cleaning, deduplication and record linkage system. SIGKDD. 2009.
  116. Abe S. Support vector machines for pattern classification. 1st ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
  117. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  118. Vapnik VN. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley, 1998.
  119. Chang C-C, Lin C-J. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University. Taipei, 2007.
  120. 120. Hauser RM. Some Exploratory Methods for Modeling Mobility Tables and Other Cross-Classified Data. Sociological Methodology 1980;11(ArticleType: research-article / Full publication date: 1980 / Copyright © 1980 John Wiley & Sons):413-58.
  121. Hout M. Mobility tables. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1983.
  122. Breen R. Individual Level Models for Mobility Tables and other Cross-Classifications. Sociological Methods & Research 1994;23(2):147-73.
  123. Hox JJ. Multilevel analysis : techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2010.
  124. van Leeuwen MHD, Maas I, Miles A. Creating a Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations. Historical Methods 2004;37(4):186-97.
  125. van Leeuwen MHD, Maas I, Miles A. Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002.
  126. Edvinsson S, Karlsson J. Recoding occupations in the Demographic Data Base into HISCO. HISMA Occasional Papers & Documents Series No. 3. Berlin, 1998.
  127. Roberts E, Woollard M, Ronnander C, Dillon LY, Thorvaldsen. G. Occupational Classification in the the North Atlantic Population Project. Historical Methods 2003;36(2):89-96.
  128. van Leeuwen MHD, Maas I. HISCLASS: A Historical International Social Class Scheme. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2011.
  129. Maas I, van Leeuwen MHD. Total and Relative Endogamy by Social Origin: A First International Comparison of Changes in Marriage Choices during the Nineteenth Century. International Review of Social History 2005;50(SupplementS13):275-95.
  130. Block W, Thomas W. Implementing the Data Documentation Initiative at the Minnesota Population Center. Historical Methods 2003;36(2):97-101.